From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from pentafluge.infradead.org (pentafluge.infradead.org [213.146.154.40]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71701DDEB9 for ; Fri, 6 Apr 2007 00:48:00 +1000 (EST) Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] Stop pmac_zilog from abusing 8250's device numbers; optionally. From: David Woodhouse To: Atsushi Nemoto , Torben Mathiasen In-Reply-To: <20070405.233101.106261123.anemo@mba.ocn.ne.jp> References: <1175666635.2932.17.camel@shinybook.infradead.org> <17939.17962.248566.886449@cargo.ozlabs.ibm.com> <1175696383.2774.24.camel@shinybook.infradead.org> <20070405.233101.106261123.anemo@mba.ocn.ne.jp> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Thu, 05 Apr 2007 10:47:15 -0400 Message-Id: <1175784435.2719.18.camel@shinybook.infradead.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, paulus@samba.org, device@lanana.org, alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Thu, 2007-04-05 at 23:31 +0900, Atsushi Nemoto wrote > Is major 204 minor 192 already allocated? Of course. The reason it took so long to provide this patch after the 'pmac_zilog doesn't load' bug got reported was because I was waiting for the new allocation. > Few weeks ago, I sent a patch to allocate 192...199 for other serial > driver Were those numbers assigned to you or did you just make them up? -- dwmw2