From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from pentafluge.infradead.org (pentafluge.infradead.org [213.146.154.40]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC365DDE4A for ; Fri, 6 Apr 2007 01:18:54 +1000 (EST) Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] Stop pmac_zilog from abusing 8250's device numbers; optionally. From: David Woodhouse To: Atsushi Nemoto In-Reply-To: <20070406.000913.28784231.anemo@mba.ocn.ne.jp> References: <1175696383.2774.24.camel@shinybook.infradead.org> <20070405.233101.106261123.anemo@mba.ocn.ne.jp> <1175784435.2719.18.camel@shinybook.infradead.org> <20070406.000913.28784231.anemo@mba.ocn.ne.jp> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Thu, 05 Apr 2007 11:18:12 -0400 Message-Id: <1175786292.2719.23.camel@shinybook.infradead.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, paulus@samba.org, torben@kernel.org, device@lanana.org, alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Fri, 2007-04-06 at 00:09 +0900, Atsushi Nemoto wrote: > > What I did is just send a patch includeing devices.txt changes to > lkml, device@lanana.org, and some others. > > Maybe I should have sent "request" (not patch) mail to > device@lanana.org first? Well, that's what it says right underneath the line in devices.txt which says: **** DEVICE DRIVERS AUTHORS PLEASE READ THIS **** It goes on to say... "Third, please don't assume that the distributed version of the list is up to date. Due to the number of registrations I have to maintain it in "batch mode", so there is likely additional registrations that haven't been listed yet." -- dwmw2