From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, Olaf Hering <olaf@aepfle.de>,
Christian Krafft <krafft@de.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] generic check_legacy_ioport
Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 10:12:20 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1177459940.14873.171.camel@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200704250001.18162.arnd@arndb.de>
On Wed, 2007-04-25 at 00:01 +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Tuesday 24 April 2007, Olaf Hering wrote:
> >
> > > Do you think a device_type fdc, i8042 or ipmi will appear outside an isa
> > > node?
> >
> > Does anyone know where those ipmi devices appear in the device-tree?
>
> There are actually _no_ ipmi devices that we expect to appear here.
> the reason why the check is in the ipmi driver is in order not to crash
> on powerpc machines that load the ipmi driver but have no ipmi nodes
> in the device tree.
To be totally correct, there might well be, but we shouldn't care.
That is, if a device XXX (let's say XXX is ipmi but it could be i8042 or
whatever else) exist in the device-tree outside of the ISA bus, then it
needs it's own platform or of_platform device to be probed and shouldn't
make the check_legacy_io_port() go true.
There are various cases (especially in embedded world) where "standard"
components have been puts in ASICs but at funky/different addresses, and
they shouldn't be hit by the legacy probe.
Thus, the default implementation of check_legacy_ioport() should only
match things that are under an "isa" bus. Anything else needs to be
handled either by a platform specific check_legacy_ioport() override via
ppc_md (if it's really some legacy stuff and under a fucked up
device-tree) or via driver specific alternate probing method (like an
of_platform_device).
Ben.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-04-25 0:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-04-17 21:07 [PATCH] generic check_legacy_ioport Olaf Hering
2007-04-17 21:22 ` Arnd Bergmann
2007-04-17 23:28 ` Segher Boessenkool
2007-04-20 18:51 ` Olaf Hering
2007-04-22 5:15 ` Milton Miller
2007-04-22 6:46 ` Olaf Hering
2007-04-23 8:15 ` [PATCH] " Olaf Hering
2007-04-24 0:53 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2007-04-24 11:25 ` Olaf Hering
2007-04-24 15:45 ` Milton Miller
2007-04-24 18:54 ` Olaf Hering
2007-04-24 22:01 ` Arnd Bergmann
2007-04-25 0:12 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt [this message]
2007-04-25 1:54 ` Segher Boessenkool
2007-04-25 7:49 ` Arnd Bergmann
2007-04-25 13:33 ` Segher Boessenkool
2007-04-25 22:02 ` Arnd Bergmann
2007-04-25 0:09 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2007-04-24 22:34 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2007-04-25 20:36 ` Olaf Hering
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1177459940.14873.171.camel@localhost.localdomain \
--to=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=krafft@de.ibm.com \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
--cc=olaf@aepfle.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).