linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mahesh Jagannath Salgaonkar <mahesh@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Pingfan Liu <kernelfans@gmail.com>
Cc: linuxppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org>,
	Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	"Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Ananth Narayan <ananth@in.ibm.com>,
	Hari Bathini <hbathini@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Nathan Fontenot <nfont@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Anshuman Khandual <khandual@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 6/7] powerpc/fadump: Do not allow hot-remove memory from fadump reserved area.
Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2018 17:07:59 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1177bec0-d2aa-edef-695f-f3e4d4f2f8d3@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAFgQCTu0qLrHuuiaCpPPEoFesz+19V+0CCQY-rjPz2chcNL1gw@mail.gmail.com>

On 04/03/2018 08:48 AM, Pingfan Liu wrote:
> I think CMA has protected us from hot-remove, so this patch is not necessary.

Yes, but only if the memory from declared CMA region is allocated using
cma_alloc(). The rest of the memory inside CMA region which hasn't been
cma_allocat-ed can still be hot-removed. Hence this patch is necessary.

fadump allocates only 1 page from fadump CMA region for metadata region.
Rest all memory is free to use by applications and vulnerable to hot-remove.

Thanks,
-Mahesh.

> 
> Regards,
> Pingfan
> 
> On Mon, Apr 2, 2018 at 2:30 PM, Mahesh J Salgaonkar
> <mahesh@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
>> From: Mahesh Salgaonkar <mahesh@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>>
>> For fadump to work successfully there should not be any holes in reserved
>> memory ranges where kernel has asked firmware to move the content of old
>> kernel memory in event of crash. But this memory area is currently not
>> protected from hot-remove operations. Hence, fadump service can fail to
>> re-register after the hot-remove operation, if hot-removed memory belongs
>> to fadump reserved region. To avoid this make sure that memory from fadump
>> reserved area is not hot-removable if fadump is registered.
>>
>> However, if user still wants to remove that memory, he can do so by
>> manually stopping fadump service before hot-remove operation.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Mahesh Salgaonkar <mahesh@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>> ---
>>  arch/powerpc/include/asm/fadump.h               |    2 +-
>>  arch/powerpc/kernel/fadump.c                    |   10 ++++++++--
>>  arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/hotplug-memory.c |    7 +++++--
>>  3 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/fadump.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/fadump.h
>> index 44b6ebfe9be6..d16dc77107a8 100644
>> --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/fadump.h
>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/fadump.h
>> @@ -207,7 +207,7 @@ struct fad_crash_memory_ranges {
>>         unsigned long long      size;
>>  };
>>
>> -extern int is_fadump_boot_memory_area(u64 addr, ulong size);
>> +extern int is_fadump_memory_area(u64 addr, ulong size);
>>  extern int early_init_dt_scan_fw_dump(unsigned long node,
>>                 const char *uname, int depth, void *data);
>>  extern int fadump_reserve_mem(void);
>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/fadump.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/fadump.c
>> index 59aaf0357a52..2c3c7e655eec 100644
>> --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/fadump.c
>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/fadump.c
>> @@ -162,13 +162,19 @@ int __init early_init_dt_scan_fw_dump(unsigned long node,
>>
>>  /*
>>   * If fadump is registered, check if the memory provided
>> - * falls within boot memory area.
>> + * falls within boot memory area and reserved memory area.
>>   */
>> -int is_fadump_boot_memory_area(u64 addr, ulong size)
>> +int is_fadump_memory_area(u64 addr, ulong size)
>>  {
>> +       u64 d_start = fw_dump.reserve_dump_area_start;
>> +       u64 d_end = d_start + fw_dump.reserve_dump_area_size;
>> +
>>         if (!fw_dump.dump_registered)
>>                 return 0;
>>
>> +       if (((addr + size) > d_start) && (addr <= d_end))
>> +               return 1;
>> +
>>         return (addr + size) > RMA_START && addr <= fw_dump.boot_memory_size;
>>  }
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/hotplug-memory.c b/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/hotplug-memory.c
>> index c1578f54c626..e4c658cda3a7 100644
>> --- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/hotplug-memory.c
>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/hotplug-memory.c
>> @@ -389,8 +389,11 @@ static bool lmb_is_removable(struct drmem_lmb *lmb)
>>         phys_addr = lmb->base_addr;
>>
>>  #ifdef CONFIG_FA_DUMP
>> -       /* Don't hot-remove memory that falls in fadump boot memory area */
>> -       if (is_fadump_boot_memory_area(phys_addr, block_sz))
>> +       /*
>> +        * Don't hot-remove memory that falls in fadump boot memory area
>> +        * and memory that is reserved for capturing old kernel memory.
>> +        */
>> +       if (is_fadump_memory_area(phys_addr, block_sz))
>>                 return false;
>>  #endif
>>
>>
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2018-04-03 11:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-04-02  6:29 [PATCH v3 0/7] powerpc/fadump: Improvements and fixes for firmware-assisted dump Mahesh J Salgaonkar
2018-04-02  6:29 ` [PATCH v3 1/7] powerpc/fadump: Move the metadata region to start of the reserved area Mahesh J Salgaonkar
2018-04-03 19:26   ` Hari Bathini
2018-04-05  4:50     ` Mahesh Jagannath Salgaonkar
2018-04-02  6:30 ` [PATCH v3 2/7] powerpc/fadump: Update documentation to reflect the metadata region movement Mahesh J Salgaonkar
2018-04-02  6:30 ` [PATCH v3 3/7] powerpc/fadump: Reservationless firmware assisted dump Mahesh J Salgaonkar
2018-04-02  6:30 ` [PATCH v3 4/7] powerpc/fadump: exclude memory holes while reserving memory in second kernel Mahesh J Salgaonkar
2018-04-03  9:51   ` Hari Bathini
2018-04-03 11:39     ` Mahesh Jagannath Salgaonkar
2018-04-02  6:30 ` [PATCH v3 5/7] powerpc/fadump: throw proper error message on fadump registration failure Mahesh J Salgaonkar
2018-04-02  6:30 ` [PATCH v3 6/7] powerpc/fadump: Do not allow hot-remove memory from fadump reserved area Mahesh J Salgaonkar
2018-04-03  3:18   ` Pingfan Liu
2018-04-03 11:37     ` Mahesh Jagannath Salgaonkar [this message]
2018-04-02  6:30 ` [PATCH v3 7/7] powerpc/fadump: un-register fadump on kexec path Mahesh J Salgaonkar

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1177bec0-d2aa-edef-695f-f3e4d4f2f8d3@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --to=mahesh@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=ananth@in.ibm.com \
    --cc=aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=hbathini@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=kernelfans@gmail.com \
    --cc=khandual@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
    --cc=nfont@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).