From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from sipsolutions.net (crystal.sipsolutions.net [195.210.38.204]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CDA07DE077 for ; Thu, 3 May 2007 22:47:16 +1000 (EST) Subject: Re: [PATCH] powerpc: dart iommu suspend From: Johannes Berg To: Benjamin Herrenschmidt In-Reply-To: <1178195447.6353.40.camel@localhost.localdomain> References: <17969.56735.644629.328360@cargo.ozlabs.ibm.com> <1178195106.13233.108.camel@johannes.berg> <1178195312.13233.111.camel@johannes.berg> <1178195447.6353.40.camel@localhost.localdomain> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-cczf5sC6HSlPwFa8CpJP" Date: Thu, 03 May 2007 14:48:11 +0200 Message-Id: <1178196492.8233.1.camel@johannes.berg> Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: Olof Johansson , linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, Paul Mackerras List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , --=-cczf5sC6HSlPwFa8CpJP Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, 2007-05-03 at 22:30 +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: > That would make it "just work" with the normal code path. We still need the iommu restore hook to invalidate the entries, so that API I add there is needed anyway. Who actually saves the code doesn't really matter at that point. The save hook isn't strictly necessary then but I guess it should be there for symmetry anyway. Maybe somebody can offer opinions on other iommus? johannes --=-cczf5sC6HSlPwFa8CpJP Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Comment: Johannes Berg (powerbook) iD8DBQBGOdoL/ETPhpq3jKURAs/9AKCMxfYJGIyeKdcCUQ05zJC8SsRHTQCglrf7 /SnZudKkRLA2LLaLtuMkvT0= =8RBR -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-cczf5sC6HSlPwFa8CpJP--