From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from de01egw01.freescale.net (de01egw01.freescale.net [192.88.165.102]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "de01egw01.freescale.net", Issuer "Thawte Premium Server CA" (verified OK)) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58F9BDDFE8 for ; Fri, 4 May 2007 02:17:47 +1000 (EST) Subject: Re: [PATCH] 86xx: Enable the AC97 interface on 8641D board. From: Jon Loeliger To: Olof Johansson In-Reply-To: <20070503161000.GA31881@lixom.net> References: <1178142818.32136.51.camel@ld0161-tx32> <08D3A1CE-12E0-4759-B055-DE227EA4135E@kernel.crashing.org> <1178207725.17201.33.camel@ld0161-tx32> <20070503161000.GA31881@lixom.net> Content-Type: text/plain Message-Id: <1178209046.17201.55.camel@ld0161-tx32> Mime-Version: 1.0 Date: Thu, 03 May 2007 11:17:26 -0500 Cc: "linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org" List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Thu, 2007-05-03 at 11:10, Olof Johansson wrote: > > This sounds like something that firmware should take care of, not > hardcoded in the board code. Seems like the device is just a PCI device > that doesn't have a device tree entry. Well, it's not a PCI device at all. > Why not do this in u-boot instead? Why do it there? We'd have to do it _again_ in Linux if we didn't come in from U-Boot anyway. jdl