From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
To: Jon Loeliger <jdl@freescale.com>
Cc: "linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org" <linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Remove CPU_FTR_NEED_COHERENT for 7448.
Date: Fri, 04 May 2007 07:36:48 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1178228208.6353.55.camel@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1178208838.17201.52.camel@ld0161-tx32>
On Thu, 2007-05-03 at 11:13 -0500, Jon Loeliger wrote:
> On Thu, 2007-05-03 at 05:17, Adrian Cox wrote:
> > On Wed, 2007-05-02 at 16:34 -0500, Jon Loeliger wrote:
> > > From: James.Yang <James.Yang@freescale.com>
> > >
> > > Remove CPU_FTR_NEED_COHERENT for MPC7448 (and single-core MPC86xx).
> > > This prevents needlessly setting M=1 when not SMP.
> >
> > There may be side effects to removing this. Most of the 74xx processors
> > had this flag added because of the L2 prefetch bug (erratum #16 on the
> > 7447A). I see that bug is missing from the 7448 errata.
> >
> > The problem is that many 32-bit PowerPC machines needed
> > CPU_FTR_NEED_COHERENT set for a second reason: compatibility with the
> > cache in the MPC107. This was handled by CPU_FTR_COMMON in cputable.h
> > before the L2 prefetch bug was known. There may be other host bridges
> > that cache, but nobody will have noticed because all the CPUs had
> > CPU_FTR_NEED_COHERENT set already.
>
> Adrian,
>
> Yes, you are correct and your concern is valid. However,
> this case is still being handled by CONFIG_MPC10X_BRIDGE
> to deal with the MPC106/MPC107/etc north bridges.
I still maintain it should be a runtime thing tho :-)
Ben.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-05-03 21:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-05-02 21:34 [PATCH] Remove CPU_FTR_NEED_COHERENT for 7448 Jon Loeliger
2007-05-03 10:17 ` Adrian Cox
2007-05-03 10:53 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2007-05-03 16:13 ` Jon Loeliger
2007-05-03 17:07 ` Adrian Cox
2007-05-03 17:38 ` Jon Loeliger
2007-05-03 21:36 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt [this message]
2007-05-04 15:16 ` Jon Loeliger
2007-05-04 22:25 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2007-05-05 13:25 ` Adrian Cox
2007-05-07 17:31 ` Loeliger Jon-LOELIGER
2007-05-04 20:19 ` Kumar Gala
2007-05-03 11:02 ` Paul Mackerras
2007-05-03 16:04 ` Jon Loeliger
2007-05-03 23:34 ` Paul Mackerras
2007-05-04 15:13 ` Jon Loeliger
2007-05-10 16:17 ` Kumar Gala
2007-05-10 16:44 ` Jon Loeliger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1178228208.6353.55.camel@localhost.localdomain \
--to=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=jdl@freescale.com \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).