From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from sipsolutions.net (crystal.sipsolutions.net [195.210.38.204]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46A97DE004 for ; Fri, 4 May 2007 20:51:14 +1000 (EST) Subject: Re: [PATCH] powerpc: dart iommu suspend From: Johannes Berg To: Olof Johansson In-Reply-To: <20070503142441.GA31110@lixom.net> References: <17969.56735.644629.328360@cargo.ozlabs.ibm.com> <1178195106.13233.108.camel@johannes.berg> <1178195312.13233.111.camel@johannes.berg> <1178195447.6353.40.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1178196492.8233.1.camel@johannes.berg> <20070503142441.GA31110@lixom.net> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-SHo/5FCyBN5z6IPPttrn" Date: Fri, 04 May 2007 12:51:42 +0200 Message-Id: <1178275903.7408.3.camel@johannes.berg> Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: Paul Mackerras , linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , --=-SHo/5FCyBN5z6IPPttrn Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, 2007-05-03 at 09:24 -0500, Olof Johansson wrote: > > Maybe somebody can offer opinions on other iommus? >=20 > The PWRficient iommu [...] > I don't know what's happened to the IBM bloa^WPAPR platforms [...] Thanks for this analysis. I guess that we really want the save/restore hooks there, and then it doesn't matter if the dart code right now actually does the copy or if we manage to map it CI up front, we can fix that later. johannes --=-SHo/5FCyBN5z6IPPttrn Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Comment: Johannes Berg (powerbook) iD8DBQBGOxA+/ETPhpq3jKURAtErAJ0TURiiCrX8AQ2jNPyT8LuwanF5lgCfczzT r/C9aXz14jCUT5NlH9iLWNc= =o4TM -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-SHo/5FCyBN5z6IPPttrn--