From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from e1.ny.us.ibm.com (e1.ny.us.ibm.com [32.97.182.141]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "e1.ny.us.ibm.com", Issuer "Equifax" (verified OK)) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 07D3FDDEBE for ; Tue, 15 May 2007 11:03:35 +1000 (EST) Received: from d01relay02.pok.ibm.com (d01relay02.pok.ibm.com [9.56.227.234]) by e1.ny.us.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l4F13WVC008218 for ; Mon, 14 May 2007 21:03:32 -0400 Received: from d01av02.pok.ibm.com (d01av02.pok.ibm.com [9.56.224.216]) by d01relay02.pok.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v8.3) with ESMTP id l4F13WoI487322 for ; Mon, 14 May 2007 21:03:32 -0400 Received: from d01av02.pok.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d01av02.pok.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.13.3) with ESMTP id l4F13Wh8012424 for ; Mon, 14 May 2007 21:03:32 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] Bamboo platform support From: Josh Boyer To: Stephen Rothwell In-Reply-To: <20070515105837.204d080f.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> References: <1179154608.3420.21.camel@zod.rchland.ibm.com> <1179154743.3420.25.camel@zod.rchland.ibm.com> <20070515105837.204d080f.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Mon, 14 May 2007 20:03:23 -0500 Message-Id: <1179191003.3420.78.camel@zod.rchland.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Tue, 2007-05-15 at 10:58 +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi Josh, > > On Mon, 14 May 2007 09:59:03 -0500 Josh Boyer wrote: > > > > @@ -35,6 +35,7 @@ config 440EP > > bool > > select PPC_FPU > > select IBM440EP_ERR42 > > +# select IBM_NEW_EMAC_ZMII > > This bit belongs in a separate patch (I assume it slipped in by accident). Wasn't by accident. I was following the lead of what was done for Ebony/440GP (which is actually broken at the moment but has a patch pending to comment it out as above). There is no ethernet period without the new EMAC rewrite and I'd like to leave the select there but commented out to serve as a placeholder if nothing else. Of course, if there are lots of objections it can be pulled. josh