From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from gate.crashing.org (gate.crashing.org [63.228.1.57]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99BAEDDEE4 for ; Tue, 15 May 2007 16:04:10 +1000 (EST) Subject: Re: [RFC/PATCH] powerpc: Rewrite IO allocation & mapping on powerpc64 From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt To: Segher Boessenkool In-Reply-To: <66b16b11858147b8790b70416fd3833a@kernel.crashing.org> References: <20070514075415.7999BDDEC8@ozlabs.org> <246be0d2277753c0c0b61d0f4131c092@kernel.crashing.org> <17992.64515.797925.855510@cargo.ozlabs.ibm.com> <66b16b11858147b8790b70416fd3833a@kernel.crashing.org> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Tue, 15 May 2007 16:04:00 +1000 Message-Id: <1179209041.32247.149.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, Paul Mackerras , Anton Blanchard List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Tue, 2007-05-15 at 06:33 +0200, Segher Boessenkool wrote: > > Ben, can we have a config option to _not_ create a > mapping for the legacy hardcoded stuff, even if there > is an "isa" device node? Some platforms do not need > it or want it, and it can help find the remaining > drivers that do this x86 nastiness. Maybe separately... let's not introduce too much breakage in one patch :-) Ben.