From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from gate.crashing.org (gate.crashing.org [63.228.1.57]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A675DDF39 for ; Tue, 15 May 2007 17:34:31 +1000 (EST) Subject: Re: [patch 4/4] powerpc 2.6.21-rt1: reduce scheduling latency by changing tlb flush size From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt To: Tsutomu OWA In-Reply-To: References: <1179125506.22481.297.camel@localhost.localdomain> <200705141640.02561.arnd@arndb.de> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Tue, 15 May 2007 17:34:12 +1000 Message-Id: <1179214452.32247.170.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, Thomas Gleixner , mingo@elte.hu, Arnd Bergmann , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Tue, 2007-05-15 at 13:12 +0900, Tsutomu OWA wrote: > > With this code, you get silent side-effects of enabling PPC_CELLEB > > along with another platform. > > Yeah, thank you for pointing it out. > I'll send revised patch later. > > > Maybe instead you should change the hpte_need_flush() to always flush > > when running on the celleb platform and PREEMPT_RT is enabled. > > Hmm... Is it in linux-2.6.21? grep'ing it did not help... > > Is http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/linuxppc/patch?id=10361 is the first place > where the hpte_need_flush() appears? Yes, I added that when reworking the batching mecanism. Ben.