From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from gateway-1237.mvista.com (gateway-1237.mvista.com [63.81.120.158]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3403CDDDD5 for ; Thu, 17 May 2007 10:11:53 +1000 (EST) Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] Add legacy devices to mpc8641_hpcn.dts From: Wade Farnsworth To: Segher Boessenkool In-Reply-To: References: <1179245829.8132.100.camel@rhino> <1179246470.8132.112.camel@rhino> <1179333421.7018.17.camel@ld0161-tx32> <1179346653.8132.223.camel@rhino> <0c3907573f12a0731d03335fe3334363@kernel.crashing.org> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Wed, 16 May 2007 17:11:52 -0700 Message-Id: <1179360712.8132.238.camel@rhino> Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: linuxppc-dev List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Thu, 2007-05-17 at 01:47 +0200, Segher Boessenkool wrote: > >> Is there a recommended "compatible" property for a standard PC-like > >> CMOS > >> RTC? > > > > None in the bindings that I know of. It typically would > > be the model name/number of the oldest chip used, or one > > that is very commonly used. > > "pnpPNP,b00" > > > Segher > Thanks. I'll look into making the RTC set up code generic. --Wade