From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from de01egw02.freescale.net (de01egw02.freescale.net [192.88.165.103]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "de01egw02.freescale.net", Issuer "Thawte Premium Server CA" (verified OK)) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8773EDDF2C for ; Sat, 19 May 2007 02:45:06 +1000 (EST) Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] Add legacy devices to mpc8641_hpcn.dts From: Jon Loeliger To: Segher Boessenkool In-Reply-To: <0c3907573f12a0731d03335fe3334363@kernel.crashing.org> References: <1179245829.8132.100.camel@rhino> <1179246470.8132.112.camel@rhino> <1179333421.7018.17.camel@ld0161-tx32> <1179346653.8132.223.camel@rhino> <0c3907573f12a0731d03335fe3334363@kernel.crashing.org> Content-Type: text/plain Message-Id: <1179506692.19188.2.camel@ld0161-tx32> Mime-Version: 1.0 Date: Fri, 18 May 2007 11:44:52 -0500 Cc: linuxppc-dev List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Wed, 2007-05-16 at 18:40, Segher Boessenkool wrote: > > Is there a recommended "compatible" property for a standard PC-like > > CMOS > > RTC? > > None in the bindings that I know of. It typically would > be the model name/number of the oldest chip used, or one > that is very commonly used. And I haven't actually gotten it to work yet either... Am I missing something? Like a CONFIG_ option beyond the RTC and CMOS variant that is necessary? Dumbly, jdl