From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from gateway-1237.mvista.com (gateway-1237.mvista.com [63.81.120.158]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32A1FDDE49 for ; Tue, 22 May 2007 01:59:45 +1000 (EST) Subject: RE: [PATCH 5/5] PCI fixes for the MPC8641 Rev 2.0 silicon and Rev1.02 hardware From: Wade Farnsworth To: Jin Zhengxiong-R64188 In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain Date: Mon, 21 May 2007 08:59:42 -0700 Message-Id: <1179763182.8132.285.camel@rhino> Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: linuxppc-dev List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Fri, 2007-05-18 at 14:52 +0800, Jin Zhengxiong-R64188 wrote: > > As you changed the class of the bridge, dev->transparent will be set > again in the later code, if you remove the 0x01 here, the > dev->transparent will be set to 0 later. So if you changed the class > like this, you do not need to set dev->transparent = 1 in your patch. > > Jason It is my understanding that neither dev->transparent, nor that bit in the PCI class should be set. --Wade