From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from gate.crashing.org (gate.crashing.org [63.228.1.57]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE0C5DDE21 for ; Tue, 22 May 2007 09:15:12 +1000 (EST) Subject: Re: Interrupt routing broken on TiBook IV with 2.6.21.x ? From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt To: Christian =?ISO-8859-1?Q?B=F6hme?= In-Reply-To: <4652219D.6050308@gmx.de> References: <4650E27B.3020401@gmx.de> <1179712614.32247.597.camel@localhost.localdomain> <4651FC48.8000002@gmx.de> <1179785502.32247.748.camel@localhost.localdomain> <4652219D.6050308@gmx.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Date: Tue, 22 May 2007 09:15:04 +1000 Message-Id: <1179789304.32247.760.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Tue, 2007-05-22 at 00:47 +0200, Christian Böhme wrote: > It's not that I am not interested nor completely new to this, it's just that > I am currently a little short on time for things like these. The last time > I checked, the Linux people have just started to make use of DMA maps, a > concept that other OS/architecture combos employed for years already. Is > that what is used in the TiBooks to allocate DMA channels ? I'm not sure what you are talking about here. DMA mapping has existed in linux for years. Ben.