linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Michael Ellerman <michael@ellerman.id.au>
To: Dave Jiang <djiang@mvista.com>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] BOOKE watchdog and kexec
Date: Wed, 23 May 2007 13:36:59 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1179891419.6145.19.camel@concordia.ozlabs.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <46538264.2050000@mvista.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1591 bytes --]

On Tue, 2007-05-22 at 16:53 -0700, Dave Jiang wrote:
> What would be the appropriate way to deal with the BOOKE watchdog in order to
> properly kexec? The BOOKE watchdog cannot be disabled. With the current
> implementation, a watchdog daemon in userland is required to poke the
> /dev/watchdog continously in order to keep it from going off. In the kexec
> situation, the watchdog daemon in userland goes away when the new kernel is
> executed. It is very possible that the new kernel can potentially timeout on a
> certain hardware device initialization (i.e. SCSI discovery/timeout) and causes
> the watchdog to go off and reset the hardware. The reset is of course not
> wanted in this situation.
> 
> Several solutions comes into mind:
> 1. Have the kernel timer poke the watchdog. This would ensure situation
> described above would never happen. I think x86 does this with NMI watchdog.
> 
> 2. Have the watchdog driver spawn a kernel thread to poke the watchdog at a
> periodic time. Or perhaps use the delayed-work mechanism to do that.
> 
> 3. Set the highest bit of the watchdog register so that it does not expire for
> 2^32 ticks.

#3 sounds the easiest. You'd set it in machine_kexec_prepare() and then
have the second kernel restore a sane value. I assume 2^32 ticks is long
enough to boot?

cheers

-- 
Michael Ellerman
OzLabs, IBM Australia Development Lab

wwweb: http://michael.ellerman.id.au
phone: +61 2 6212 1183 (tie line 70 21183)

We do not inherit the earth from our ancestors,
we borrow it from our children. - S.M.A.R.T Person

[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]

  parent reply	other threads:[~2007-05-23  3:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-05-22 23:53 [RFC] BOOKE watchdog and kexec Dave Jiang
2007-05-23  0:18 ` Geoff Levand
2007-05-23  0:29   ` Dave Jiang
2007-05-23  3:36 ` Michael Ellerman [this message]
2007-05-23  6:10   ` Kumar Gala

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1179891419.6145.19.camel@concordia.ozlabs.ibm.com \
    --to=michael@ellerman.id.au \
    --cc=djiang@mvista.com \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).