From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from gate.crashing.org (gate.crashing.org [63.228.1.57]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D792DDEF1 for ; Tue, 29 May 2007 19:03:05 +1000 (EST) Subject: Re: [RFC/PATCH 2/5] powerpc: Cleanup ptrace bits From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt To: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org In-Reply-To: <20070529064531.D874CDDF70@ozlabs.org> References: <20070529064531.D874CDDF70@ozlabs.org> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Tue, 29 May 2007 19:02:50 +1000 Message-Id: <1180429370.19517.142.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: ulrich.weigand@de.ibm.com, Paul Mackerras , Anton Blanchard List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Tue, 2007-05-29 at 16:45 +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: > > This patch cleans that up a bit by having a ptrace-common.h which > contains > really common code (and makes a lot more code common), and > ptrace-ppc32.h and > ptrace-ppc64.h files that contain the few remaining different bits. Hrm.. we do have a subtle difference in vrregs that I've missed.. I'll respin tomorrow. It looks like we don't store the VRSAVE register at the same place on 32 and 64 bits... yuck. I need to double check tomorrow. Ben.