From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from de01egw02.freescale.net (de01egw02.freescale.net [192.88.165.103]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "de01egw02.freescale.net", Issuer "Thawte Premium Server CA" (verified OK)) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73412DDE09 for ; Tue, 5 Jun 2007 04:51:11 +1000 (EST) Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/8] Let subordinate transparent bridges be transparent. From: Jon Loeliger To: Benjamin Herrenschmidt In-Reply-To: <1180740416.19517.476.camel@localhost.localdomain> References: <1180720134.14219.66.camel@ld0161-tx32> <1180740416.19517.476.camel@localhost.localdomain> Content-Type: text/plain Message-Id: <1180983061.9632.24.camel@ld0161-tx32> Mime-Version: 1.0 Date: Mon, 04 Jun 2007 13:51:01 -0500 Cc: "linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org" List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Fri, 2007-06-01 at 18:26, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: > NAK. The mem case needs a similar fix. I think we should instead do > > - if (!res->flags) > - continue; > + if (!res->flags || bus->self->transparent) > + continue; Right. Fixed as indicated. Thanks, jdl