From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from gate.crashing.org (gate.crashing.org [63.228.1.57]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C387CDDE0A for ; Thu, 7 Jun 2007 21:55:59 +1000 (EST) Subject: Re: [RFC/PATCH 4/4] Add support for MSI on Axon-based Cell systems From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt To: Jean-Christophe Dubois In-Reply-To: <200706071010.05172.jdubois@mc.com> References: <200706050900.54022.jdubois@mc.com> <1181203139.4166.26.camel@concordia.ozlabs.ibm.com> <200706071010.05172.jdubois@mc.com> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Thu, 07 Jun 2007 21:55:41 +1000 Message-Id: <1181217341.14818.48.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Thu, 2007-06-07 at 10:10 +0200, Jean-Christophe Dubois wrote: > The CAB (or other derived products) can be set in RC mode (via a jumper). In > this case the MSI could be supported. Is there any plan to have CABs based on AXON DD >= 2.0 I still think the right approach is to have the right properties set by the firmware if the Axon version supports MSIs reliably. Do you see any problem with this approach ? Ben.