From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from gateway-1237.mvista.com (gateway-1237.mvista.com [63.81.120.158]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EFE9EDDF0E for ; Fri, 8 Jun 2007 02:33:01 +1000 (EST) Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix drivers/rtc/Kconfig for powerpc From: Wade Farnsworth To: Jon Loeliger In-Reply-To: <1181232488.31686.19.camel@ld0161-tx32> References: <1181149064.5674.134.camel@rhino> <1181149622.12740.32.camel@ld0161-tx32> <1181150240.5674.139.camel@rhino> <1181232488.31686.19.camel@ld0161-tx32> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Thu, 07 Jun 2007 09:33:00 -0700 Message-Id: <1181233980.5674.174.camel@rhino> Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: a.zummo@towertech.it, rtc-linux@googlegroups.com, linuxppc-dev List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Thu, 2007-06-07 at 11:08 -0500, Jon Loeliger wrote: > On Wed, 2007-06-06 at 12:17, Wade Farnsworth wrote: > > > > > > > Did you miss where I ACK'ed it 16-May-2007? :-) > > > > Ah okay, maybe I don't understand what that means. When you say > > "Acked-by" does that mean you'll push it upstream? > > I meant that I picked the patch up, applied it to my tree, > tested it, and verified that _I_ thought it was good. > It received my Vote of Confidence, for whatever that is worth. Ok. Thanks for acking it by the way. > > > What I meant was I haven't seen anybody pick up this patch yet, and > > would like to know it if will be, or if there is something else I need > > to do. > > Right. This patch is in "generic" PowerPC related code, > and not in my area to "push upstream". I would expect, say, > Paul to pick it up directly. Perhaps Kumar would pick it up > and stage it for Paul. Perhaps akpm would pick it up. :-) > But since this is in drivers/rtc/Kconfig, wouldn't the maintainer of that subsystem be expected to pick this up? Thanks for the clarifications. --Wade