From: Zang Roy-r61911 <tie-fei.zang@freescale.com>
To: Segher Boessenkool <segher@kernel.crashing.org>
Cc: linuxppc-dev list <linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4]: Fix e500 v2 core reboot bug
Date: 13 Jun 2007 15:43:53 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1181720633.12936.19.camel@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cad6a9b0bd58df6298cb5f8402e512e7@kernel.crashing.org>
On Wed, 2007-06-13 at 15:26, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> >>> + printk (KERN_EMERG "Error: reset
> >> control \
> >>> + register not mapped,
> >> spinning!\n");
> >>
> >> ...(... "bla bla bla "
> >> "bla bla bla\n");
> >>
> >> instead? Or there'll be a lot of whitespace in your string.
> > I just do not know the difference of these two style.
>
> Your code puts a bunch of extra whitespace in the string (all
> the tabs before "register not mapped"). Two strings after
> each other (like in my example) are just pasted together.
>
> There is no real reason to break the string in two anyway, it
> is fine to have a more-than-80-char line in printk messages.
>
I separate it, because I am afraid I will be challenged by 80 char
column rule.
Please check the CodeStyle file and its example:
Statements longer than 80 columns will be broken into sensible chunks.
Descendants are always substantially shorter than the parent and are
placed
substantially to the right. The same applies to function headers with a
long
argument list. Long strings are as well broken into shorter strings.
[snip]
void fun(int a, int b, int c)
{
if (condition)
printk(KERN_WARNING "Warning this is a long printk with "
"3 parameters a: %u b: %u "
"c: %u \n", a, b, c);
else
next_statement;
}
[snip]
If it does not matter, I'd like to put them in one line :-).
Roy
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-06-13 7:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-06-13 6:53 [PATCH v4]: Fix e500 v2 core reboot bug Zang Roy-r61911
2007-06-13 7:03 ` Segher Boessenkool
2007-06-13 7:14 ` Zang Roy-r61911
2007-06-13 7:26 ` Segher Boessenkool
2007-06-13 7:43 ` Zang Roy-r61911 [this message]
2007-06-13 7:49 ` Li Yang-r58472
2007-06-13 7:55 ` Segher Boessenkool
2007-06-13 8:07 ` Zang Roy-r61911
2007-06-13 8:16 ` Li Yang-r58472
2007-06-13 9:13 ` Zang Roy-r61911
2007-06-14 13:26 ` Kumar Gala
2007-06-13 7:54 ` Segher Boessenkool
2007-06-13 8:27 ` Zang Roy-r61911
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1181720633.12936.19.camel@localhost.localdomain \
--to=tie-fei.zang@freescale.com \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
--cc=segher@kernel.crashing.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).