From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from gate.crashing.org (gate.crashing.org [63.228.1.57]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E0E20DDF46 for ; Sat, 16 Jun 2007 10:47:00 +1000 (EST) Subject: Re: [patch 00/13] CPU selection Kconfig cleanup, take 3 From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt To: Kumar Gala In-Reply-To: References: <20070612163016.253915076@arndb.de> <18032.40447.579128.989284@cargo.ozlabs.ibm.com> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Sat, 16 Jun 2007 10:46:40 +1000 Message-Id: <1181954800.26853.103.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: Sam Ravnborg , linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, Paul Mackerras , arnd@arndb.de, Stephen Rothwell List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Thu, 2007-06-14 at 08:33 -0500, Kumar Gala wrote: > On Jun 13, 2007, at 8:46 PM, Paul Mackerras wrote: > > > Most of this series of patches touch 8xxx or 5xxx stuff in one way or > > another, so I'll leave it to Kumar to make the decision about them. > > I'll put in 1/13. > > Arnd, > > I'm a little hesitant to move the embedded ppc's over to > multiplatform quite yet. One feature I wanted was in Kconfig a way > to enforce the selection of at least one choice, as well as being > able to optimize things since we only had one choice selected. > > See the following thread for discussion I had with Sam & Roman on the > subject: > > http://marc.info/?t=117156757000002&r=1&w=2 I missed that discussion... but without actually reading it (yet), I can already tell that I don't like the way you propose it. I would much prefer the CONFIG_xxx_ONLY_ONE be -generated- by the multiple choice menu if only one choice has been selected. That could be an optional argument to the menu stuff to set that. Ben.