From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Subject: Re: [RFC] Device tree for new desktop platform in arch/powerpc From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt To: Segher Boessenkool In-Reply-To: <558860c3d90100cd18df5f9a66cce3f9@kernel.crashing.org> References: <20070618185715.321010@gmx.net> <20070619054232.GB32039@localhost.localdomain> <1182429733.24740.12.camel@localhost.localdomain> <558860c3d90100cd18df5f9a66cce3f9@kernel.crashing.org> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2007 09:25:25 +1000 Message-Id: <1182468325.24740.18.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: list , David Gibson List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , > The "#address-cells" property should be completely absent, > even; for interrupt matching, that means "treat as 0, no > unit address used in interrupt mapping, just the interrupt > number", and for the "normal" purpose (defining the format > of devices on the bus rooted at / represented by this node) > it means "there is no such bus" -- this is different from > #address-cells = 0. I'd rather have it present and explicitely set to 0, which happens to be what both Apple and IBM OF implementations also do. Have you verified if the linux parser behaves properly if it's absent ? Ben.