From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from de01egw02.freescale.net (de01egw02.freescale.net [192.88.165.103]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "de01egw02.freescale.net", Issuer "Thawte Premium Server CA" (verified OK)) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4ADCADDDFB for ; Sat, 23 Jun 2007 02:20:11 +1000 (EST) Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 9/9] Created quirk_mpc8641_transparent() to initialize bridge resources. From: Jon Loeliger To: Kumar Gala In-Reply-To: <062E6779-8D69-4700-896C-FE06A5F8947E@kernel.crashing.org> References: <1180996227.9632.77.camel@ld0161-tx32> <062E6779-8D69-4700-896C-FE06A5F8947E@kernel.crashing.org> Content-Type: text/plain Message-Id: <1182529202.29873.7.camel@ld0161-tx32> Mime-Version: 1.0 Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2007 11:20:02 -0500 Cc: "linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org list" , Wei Zhang List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Fri, 2007-06-22 at 08:50, Kumar Gala wrote: > Shouldn't we put this in fsl_pcie.c since it will be need by everyone > using an 85xx/86xx pci-e controller? > - k IIRC, Ww are trying to eliminate the need for fsl_pcie.c and converge on the more generic code instead. If we can ever get the PCI-E patches accepted, the 8641 boards won't use the fsl_pcie.c file at all. :-) jdl