From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from de01egw01.freescale.net (de01egw01.freescale.net [192.88.165.102]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "de01egw01.freescale.net", Issuer "Thawte Premium Server CA" (verified OK)) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 15466DDEF7 for ; Tue, 26 Jun 2007 02:20:06 +1000 (EST) Subject: Re: [PATCH] powerpc: fix MAC address entries for 83xx, 85xx, and 86xx device trees From: Jon Loeliger To: Segher Boessenkool In-Reply-To: <70d005ce549921cc56481fe0b26faaa4@kernel.crashing.org> References: <11825407952085-git-send-email-timur@freescale.com> <70d005ce549921cc56481fe0b26faaa4@kernel.crashing.org> Content-Type: text/plain Message-Id: <1182788398.26135.5.camel@ld0161-tx32> Mime-Version: 1.0 Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2007 11:19:58 -0500 Cc: "linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org" , Timur Tabi List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Sat, 2007-06-23 at 10:50, Segher Boessenkool wrote: > > For the 83xx, 85xx, and 86xx device trees, add a "local-mac-address" > > property > > to every Ethernet node that didn't have one. Add a comment indicating > > that > > the "address" and/or "mac-address" properties are deprecated in DTS > > files > > and will be removed at a later time. Change all MAC address > > properties to > > have a zero MAC address value. > > Shouldn't you use the "??" notation instead, or is that > still not implemented? That is correct. It is still not implemented. jdl