* [PATCH] the wrong variable checked after request_irq()
@ 2007-07-15 19:59 Al Viro
2007-07-15 21:40 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Al Viro @ 2007-07-15 19:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: torvalds; +Cc: linuxppc-dev, linux-kernel
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
---
arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/setup.c | 2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/setup.c b/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/setup.c
index 470db6e..a031d99 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/setup.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/setup.c
@@ -176,7 +176,7 @@ static void __init pseries_mpic_init_IRQ(void)
return;
cascade_irq = irq_of_parse_and_map(cascade, 0);
- if (cascade == NO_IRQ) {
+ if (cascade_irq == NO_IRQ) {
printk(KERN_ERR "mpic: failed to map cascade interrupt");
return;
}
--
1.5.3.GIT
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] the wrong variable checked after request_irq()
2007-07-15 19:59 [PATCH] the wrong variable checked after request_irq() Al Viro
@ 2007-07-15 21:40 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2007-07-15 22:02 ` Al Viro
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt @ 2007-07-15 21:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Al Viro; +Cc: linuxppc-dev, torvalds, linux-kernel
On Sun, 2007-07-15 at 20:59 +0100, Al Viro wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Acked-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Out of curiosity, how did you pick it up ? You have some automated tool
to catch that (or sparse changes) or you just did -lots- of code
inspection ?
Cheers,
Ben.
> ---
> arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/setup.c | 2 +-
> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/setup.c b/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/setup.c
> index 470db6e..a031d99 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/setup.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/setup.c
> @@ -176,7 +176,7 @@ static void __init pseries_mpic_init_IRQ(void)
> return;
>
> cascade_irq = irq_of_parse_and_map(cascade, 0);
> - if (cascade == NO_IRQ) {
> + if (cascade_irq == NO_IRQ) {
> printk(KERN_ERR "mpic: failed to map cascade interrupt");
> return;
> }
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] the wrong variable checked after request_irq()
2007-07-15 21:40 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
@ 2007-07-15 22:02 ` Al Viro
2007-07-15 22:07 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Al Viro @ 2007-07-15 22:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Benjamin Herrenschmidt; +Cc: linuxppc-dev, torvalds, linux-kernel
On Mon, Jul 16, 2007 at 07:40:38AM +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> On Sun, 2007-07-15 at 20:59 +0100, Al Viro wrote:
> > Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
>
> Acked-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
>
> Out of curiosity, how did you pick it up ? You have some automated tool
> to catch that (or sparse changes) or you just did -lots- of code
> inspection ?
While testing sparse changes, actually (comparing pointers to null
pointer constant spelled without a cast to void *)... That gave several
hundred hits, most of them being immediately obvious (picking the lines
by file and line number and looking through the list had eliminated all
but about a dozen or two). Several were not...
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] the wrong variable checked after request_irq()
2007-07-15 22:02 ` Al Viro
@ 2007-07-15 22:07 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt @ 2007-07-15 22:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Al Viro; +Cc: linuxppc-dev, torvalds, linux-kernel
On Sun, 2007-07-15 at 23:02 +0100, Al Viro wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 16, 2007 at 07:40:38AM +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> > On Sun, 2007-07-15 at 20:59 +0100, Al Viro wrote:
> > > Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
> >
> > Acked-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
> >
> > Out of curiosity, how did you pick it up ? You have some automated tool
> > to catch that (or sparse changes) or you just did -lots- of code
> > inspection ?
>
> While testing sparse changes, actually (comparing pointers to null
> pointer constant spelled without a cast to void *)... That gave several
> hundred hits, most of them being immediately obvious (picking the lines
> by file and line number and looking through the list had eliminated all
> but about a dozen or two). Several were not...
Ok. In fact, it would have been nice if gcc had been able to pick it up
for another reason. The old code is:
if (cascade == NULL)
return;
cascade_irq = irq_of_parse_and_map(cascade, 0);
if (cascade == NO_IRQ) {
printk(KERN_ERR "mpic: failed to map cascade interrupt");
return;
}
And NO_IRQ is 0 on powerpc nowadays. Thus the test can never be true :-)
But it looks like gcc doesn't pick that up.
Ben.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2007-07-15 22:08 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2007-07-15 19:59 [PATCH] the wrong variable checked after request_irq() Al Viro
2007-07-15 21:40 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2007-07-15 22:02 ` Al Viro
2007-07-15 22:07 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).