From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from gate.crashing.org (gate.crashing.org [63.228.1.57]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 18CF4DDE1B for ; Tue, 17 Jul 2007 08:12:21 +1000 (EST) Subject: RE: [RFC][PATCH 6/8] Walnut DTS From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt To: Yoder Stuart-B08248 In-Reply-To: <9696D7A991D0824DBA8DFAC74A9C5FA303067256@az33exm25.fsl.freescale.net> References: <1184161957.32199.52.camel@weaponx.rchland.ibm.com> <1184162389.32199.65.camel@weaponx.rchland.ibm.com> <4EAC985A-2F04-465D-AB69-C67807310D7B@kernel.crashing.org> <9696D7A991D0824DBA8DFAC74A9C5FA3030669AF@az33exm25.fsl.freescale.net> <28A3F6B9-512B-4D86-8E0D-A7680CCE2354@kernel.crashing.org> <1184622446.25235.89.camel@localhost.localdomain> <9696D7A991D0824DBA8DFAC74A9C5FA303067256@az33exm25.fsl.freescale.net> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2007 08:12:03 +1000 Message-Id: <1184623923.25235.98.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , > > I would personally be inclined to define that whatever spec we come up > > with always require #address-cells/#size-cells for any node that can > > have either device children or interrupt children, and ban default > > values alltogether. > > Did you really mean #size-cells here? Shouldn't it be #interrupt-cells? Yup, as I said, my fingers got a bit too fast on the keyboard. I means #interrupt-cells. Ben.