From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail.wrs.com (mail.windriver.com [147.11.1.11]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13CC5DDE1E for ; Wed, 18 Jul 2007 00:29:47 +1000 (EST) Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] 82xx: Parse SMC serial device node in DTS From: Mark Zhan To: Arnd Bergmann In-Reply-To: <200707171506.43102.arnd@arndb.de> References: <469B33F9.2080604@windriver.com> <200707171406.03455.arnd@arndb.de> <1184680385.18501.51.camel@mark> <200707171506.43102.arnd@arndb.de> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2007 22:29:35 +0800 Message-Id: <1184682576.18501.62.camel@mark> Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Tue, 2007-07-17 at 15:06 +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Tuesday 17 July 2007, Mark Zhan wrote: > > Yes, basically I agree what you say. That should be the right way. > > > > but, the current situation is that: in all DTS files that are using smc > > or scc as uart device, all device node definitions have the same > > "compatible" property -- "cpm_uart" > > > > So what I do here is just following the upstream source tree. > > > > Well, AFAICS, all of them currently use scc. The 8xx platforms don't > even build correctly in the mainline kernel, so I guess it would > be good to change them to also list fsl,cpm-smc in the compatible > property. That probably could be done by another series of patches, and I really don't want to introduce those kinds of patches in my BSP patches. I don't know if the 8xx/82xx series patches from Scott Wood will cover this issue or not. We can wait for them to see where thing will go. Thanks mark zhan