linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
To: Andreas Schwab <schwab@suse.de>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: pte_offset_map for ppc assumes HIGHPTE
Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2007 09:22:45 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1185405765.5439.371.camel@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <jewswodqcn.fsf@sykes.suse.de>

On Thu, 2007-07-26 at 01:18 +0200, Andreas Schwab wrote:
> Satya <satyakiran@gmail.com> writes:
> 
> > hello,
> > The implementation of pte_offset_map() for ppc assumes that PTEs are
> > kept in highmem (CONFIG_HIGHPTE). There is only one implmentation of
> > pte_offset_map() as follows (include/asm-ppc/pgtable.h):
> >
> > #define pte_offset_map(dir, addr)               \
> >          ((pte_t *) kmap_atomic(pmd_page(*(dir)), KM_PTE0) + pte_index(addr))
> >
> > Shouldn't this be made conditional according to CONFIG_HIGHPTE is
> > defined or not
> 
> kmap_atomic is always defined with or without CONFIG_HIGHPTE.
> 
> > (as implemented in include/asm-i386/pgtable.h) ?
> 
> I don't think that needs it either.

Depends... if you have CONFIG_HIGHMEM and not CONFIG_HIGHPTE, you are wasting
time going through kmap_atomic unnecessarily no ? it will probably not do anything
because the PTE page is in lowmem but still...

Ben.

  reply	other threads:[~2007-07-25 23:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-07-25 22:16 pte_offset_map for ppc assumes HIGHPTE Satya
2007-07-25 23:10 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2007-07-25 23:18 ` Andreas Schwab
2007-07-25 23:22   ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt [this message]
2007-07-25 23:30     ` Dave McCracken
2007-07-26  0:18       ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1185405765.5439.371.camel@localhost.localdomain \
    --to=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
    --cc=schwab@suse.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).