From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Received: from gate.crashing.org (gate.crashing.org [63.228.1.57])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(Client did not present a certificate)
	by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35114DDDE9
	for <linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org>; Fri,  3 Aug 2007 08:38:17 +1000 (EST)
Subject: Re: [patch 00/14] Current 4xx patch series
From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
To: Josh Boyer <jwboyer@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
In-Reply-To: <20070802163951.11c398ee@weaponx.rchland.ibm.com>
References: <41060.0659474314$1184697204@news.gmane.org>
	<f8tgfm$e2g$1@sea.gmane.org>
	<20070802163951.11c398ee@weaponx.rchland.ibm.com>
Content-Type: text/plain
Date: Fri, 03 Aug 2007 08:38:16 +1000
Message-Id: <1186094296.5495.638.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, Hollis Blanchard <hollisb@us.ibm.com>
List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List <linuxppc-dev.ozlabs.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev>,
	<mailto:linuxppc-dev-request@ozlabs.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://ozlabs.org/pipermail/linuxppc-dev>
List-Post: <mailto:linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org>
List-Help: <mailto:linuxppc-dev-request@ozlabs.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev>,
	<mailto:linuxppc-dev-request@ozlabs.org?subject=subscribe>

On Thu, 2007-08-02 at 16:39 -0500, Josh Boyer wrote:
> 
> Someone brought up the fact that the EMAC rewrite is mostly just
> changing probing code and the guts are still similar to the current
> EMAC driver.  I haven't really looked into it yet, but if that's true,
> I'd be curious as to why it was done that way.

Ask :-) What specifically do you want to know ?

Ben.