From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/6] PowerPC 440EPx: Sequoia DTS From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt To: Sergei Shtylyov In-Reply-To: <46B76A5A.3030300@ru.mvista.com> References: <20070730150648.GA5005@ru.mvista.com> <20070801020836.GB31391@localhost.localdomain> <65ff446478a9fd0a48061079d5f04f8f@kernel.crashing.org> <20070801050422.GI31391@localhost.localdomain> <20070801054751.GM31391@localhost.localdomain> <46B1F6D4.3070707@ru.mvista.com> <20070803031349.GD6418@localhost.localdomain> <46B34E1F.5060009@ru.mvista.com> <20070806042109.GB6103@localhost.localdomain> <46B76A5A.3030300@ru.mvista.com> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Tue, 07 Aug 2007 08:15:23 +1000 Message-Id: <1186438523.938.83.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, David Gibson List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Mon, 2007-08-06 at 22:37 +0400, Sergei Shtylyov wrote: > > Actually, checking for the presence of all possible perverted > mapping > props doesn't seem a good idea -- it's simpler to check for the > presence of > one prop (like "direct-mapped" I was thinking about, or maybe > "simple-map"). Or more simply... if it's not a direct mapping, it doesn't have a ranges property and can't be walked down by conventional means. Ben.