From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from de01egw02.freescale.net (de01egw02.freescale.net [192.88.165.103]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "de01egw02.freescale.net", Issuer "Thawte Premium Server CA" (verified OK)) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC58ADDE09 for ; Fri, 24 Aug 2007 07:05:11 +1000 (EST) Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] Remove unnecessary loops_per_jiffy initialization code From: Jon Loeliger To: Kumar Gala In-Reply-To: References: <1185560634.8055.170.camel@ld0161-tx32> <1187900581.28951.17.camel@ld0161-tx32> Content-Type: text/plain Message-Id: <1187903099.28951.19.camel@ld0161-tx32> Mime-Version: 1.0 Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2007 16:04:59 -0500 Cc: "linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org" List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Thu, 2007-08-23 at 15:47, Kumar Gala wrote: > > Any reason why patches 1/5 and 2/5, for 86xx and 85xx respectively, > > did not get applied and ushered upstream with the others? > > No, I'm glad you said something cause I assumed paul grabbed them all. > > I'll grab them in my tree once I beat paul into pulling the include > fixup changes. > > - k OK, sounds good. Thanks, jdl