From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from canuck.infradead.org (canuck.infradead.org [209.217.80.40]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81E96DDD0A for ; Sat, 15 Sep 2007 23:14:02 +1000 (EST) Subject: Re: [PATCH] add Kconfig option for optimizing for cell From: David Woodhouse To: Arnd Bergmann In-Reply-To: <200709150221.57825.arnd@arndb.de> References: <200709150221.57825.arnd@arndb.de> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Sat, 15 Sep 2007 14:13:55 +0100 Message-Id: <1189862035.3742.5.camel@shinybook.infradead.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Sat, 2007-09-15 at 02:21 +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > Since the PPE on cell is an in-order core, it suffers significantly > from wrong instruction scheduling. This adds an Kconfig option that > enables passing -mtune=cell to gcc in order to generate object > code that runs well on cell. Do we have an option which is useful for a multiplatform kernel (and for userspace) and which lies between the two extremes? Something which will improve performance on Cell (and POWER6?) without sucking too hard elsewhere? -- dwmw2