From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from e32.co.us.ibm.com (e32.co.us.ibm.com [32.97.110.150]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "e32.co.us.ibm.com", Issuer "Equifax" (verified OK)) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F78CDDDF5 for ; Mon, 17 Sep 2007 14:15:43 +1000 (EST) Received: from d03relay02.boulder.ibm.com (d03relay02.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.195.227]) by e32.co.us.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l8H37oAr013572 for ; Sun, 16 Sep 2007 23:07:50 -0400 Received: from d03av01.boulder.ibm.com (d03av01.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.195.167]) by d03relay02.boulder.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v8.5) with ESMTP id l8H4FeRD477424 for ; Sun, 16 Sep 2007 22:15:40 -0600 Received: from d03av01.boulder.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d03av01.boulder.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.13.3) with ESMTP id l8H4Fd8N024024 for ; Sun, 16 Sep 2007 22:15:40 -0600 Subject: Re: [PATCH] fix xmon input on 440 From: Hollis Blanchard To: Olof Johansson In-Reply-To: <20070917033924.GA24914@lixom.net> References: <1189802687.20625.74.camel@basalt> <20070917025223.GG32725@localhost.localdomain> <1189999598.17593.18.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20070917033924.GA24914@lixom.net> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Sun, 16 Sep 2007 23:15:21 -0500 Message-Id: <1190002521.16747.1.camel@basalt> Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: linuxppc-dev , David Gibson Reply-To: Hollis Blanchard List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Sun, 2007-09-16 at 22:39 -0500, Olof Johansson wrote: > On Sun, Sep 16, 2007 at 10:26:37PM -0500, Josh Boyer wrote: > > On Mon, 2007-09-17 at 12:52 +1000, David Gibson wrote: > > > On Fri, Sep 14, 2007 at 03:44:47PM -0500, Hollis Blanchard wrote: > > > > Implement udbg_getc() for 440, which fixes xmon input. > > > > Signed-off-by: Hollis Blanchard > > > Acked-by: David Gibson > > > > > > > I fixed up the whitespace issues and applied it to my tree. Oh, and > > comments don't need semi-colons ;) > > Well, there's a big difference between: > > while (foo) > /* moof */; > return bar; > > and: > while (foo) > /* moof */ > return bar; Right, so this commit is broken: http://git.infradead.org/?p=users/jwboyer/powerpc.git;a=commitdiff;h=81ec428065c01e37fb143ad31dc04fea27fddcac -- Hollis Blanchard IBM Linux Technology Center