From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
To: Michael Ellerman <michael@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] Simplify rtas_change_msi() error semantics
Date: Tue, 02 Oct 2007 15:23:23 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1191302603.6310.88.camel@pasglop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <fbd88f287ba9d9ca41b5c8da734afd595ae25922.1190270165.git.michael@ellerman.id.au>
On Thu, 2007-09-20 at 16:36 +1000, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> Currently rtas_change_msi() returns either the error code from RTAS, or if
> the RTAS call succeeded the number of irqs that were configured by RTAS.
> This makes checking the return value more complicated than it needs to be.
>
> Instead, have rtas_change_msi() check that the number of irqs configured by
> RTAS is equal to what we requested - and return an error otherwise. This makes
> the return semantics match the usual 0 for success, something else for error.
>
> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <michael@ellerman.id.au>
Looks allright, just a question tho... what do we do if it fails ? Do we
try to fallback to a lower number of MSIs ? Or what ? Dead device ?
Ben.
> ---
> arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/msi.c | 18 +++++++++++-------
> 1 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/msi.c b/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/msi.c
> index 9c3bcfe..2793a1b 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/msi.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/msi.c
> @@ -70,11 +70,15 @@ static int rtas_change_msi(struct pci_dn *pdn, u32 func, u32 num_irqs)
> seq_num = rtas_ret[1];
> } while (rtas_busy_delay(rc));
>
> - if (rc == 0) /* Success */
> - rc = rtas_ret[0];
> + /*
> + * If the RTAS call succeeded, check the number of irqs is actually
> + * what we asked for. If not, return an error.
> + */
> + if (rc == 0 && rtas_ret[0] != num_irqs)
> + rc = -ENOSPC;
>
> - pr_debug("rtas_msi: ibm,change_msi(func=%d,num=%d) = (%d)\n",
> - func, num_irqs, rc);
> + pr_debug("rtas_msi: ibm,change_msi(func=%d,num=%d), got %d rc = %d\n",
> + func, num_irqs, rtas_ret[0], rc);
>
> return rc;
> }
> @@ -87,7 +91,7 @@ static void rtas_disable_msi(struct pci_dev *pdev)
> if (!pdn)
> return;
>
> - if (rtas_change_msi(pdn, RTAS_CHANGE_FN, 0) != 0)
> + if (rtas_change_msi(pdn, RTAS_CHANGE_FN, 0))
> pr_debug("rtas_msi: Setting MSIs to 0 failed!\n");
> }
>
> @@ -180,14 +184,14 @@ static int rtas_setup_msi_irqs(struct pci_dev *pdev, int nvec, int type)
> if (type == PCI_CAP_ID_MSI) {
> rc = rtas_change_msi(pdn, RTAS_CHANGE_MSI_FN, nvec);
>
> - if (rc != nvec) {
> + if (rc) {
> pr_debug("rtas_msi: trying the old firmware call.\n");
> rc = rtas_change_msi(pdn, RTAS_CHANGE_FN, nvec);
> }
> } else
> rc = rtas_change_msi(pdn, RTAS_CHANGE_MSIX_FN, nvec);
>
> - if (rc != nvec) {
> + if (rc) {
> pr_debug("rtas_msi: rtas_change_msi() failed\n");
> return rc;
> }
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-10-02 5:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-09-20 6:36 [PATCH 1/4] Simplify error logic in u3msi_setup_msi_irqs() Michael Ellerman
2007-09-20 6:36 ` [PATCH 2/4] Simplify error logic in rtas_setup_msi_irqs() Michael Ellerman
2007-10-02 5:21 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2007-09-20 6:36 ` [PATCH 3/4] Simplify rtas_change_msi() error semantics Michael Ellerman
2007-10-02 5:23 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt [this message]
2007-10-02 5:58 ` Michael Ellerman
2007-10-02 6:24 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2007-10-02 7:40 ` Michael Ellerman
2007-10-02 8:37 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2007-09-20 6:36 ` [PATCH 4/4] Inline u3msi_compose_msi_msg() Michael Ellerman
2007-10-02 5:24 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2007-10-02 5:21 ` [PATCH 1/4] Simplify error logic in u3msi_setup_msi_irqs() Benjamin Herrenschmidt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1191302603.6310.88.camel@pasglop \
--to=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
--cc=michael@ellerman.id.au \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).