Re: [PATCH 3/4] Simplify rtas_change_msi() error semantics

[Michael Ellerman <michael@ellerman.id.au>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1340 bytes --]

On Tue, 2007-10-02 at 15:23 +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> On Thu, 2007-09-20 at 16:36 +1000, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> > Currently rtas_change_msi() returns either the error code from RTAS, or if
> > the RTAS call succeeded the number of irqs that were configured by RTAS.
> > This makes checking the return value more complicated than it needs to be.
> > 
> > Instead, have rtas_change_msi() check that the number of irqs configured by
> > RTAS is equal to what we requested - and return an error otherwise. This makes
> > the return semantics match the usual 0 for success, something else for error.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <michael@ellerman.id.au>
> 
> Looks allright, just a question tho... what do we do if it fails ? Do we
> try to fallback to a lower number of MSIs ? Or what ? Dead device ?

That's all up to the device driver. In theory the driver could try again
with a lower count - but that might require extra logic in the driver to
handle shared irq handlers etc. In practice I think the current drivers
will just fail.

cheers

-- 
Michael Ellerman
OzLabs, IBM Australia Development Lab

wwweb: http://michael.ellerman.id.au
phone: +61 2 6212 1183 (tie line 70 21183)

We do not inherit the earth from our ancestors,
we borrow it from our children. - S.M.A.R.T Person

[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]