From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from e32.co.us.ibm.com (e32.co.us.ibm.com [32.97.110.150]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "e32.co.us.ibm.com", Issuer "Equifax" (verified OK)) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7328DDDDF7 for ; Thu, 4 Oct 2007 20:59:55 +1000 (EST) Received: from d03relay02.boulder.ibm.com (d03relay02.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.195.227]) by e32.co.us.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l949pPOn018119 for ; Thu, 4 Oct 2007 05:51:25 -0400 Received: from d03av02.boulder.ibm.com (d03av02.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.195.168]) by d03relay02.boulder.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v8.5) with ESMTP id l94Axpbn464914 for ; Thu, 4 Oct 2007 04:59:51 -0600 Received: from d03av02.boulder.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d03av02.boulder.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.13.3) with ESMTP id l94AxoiC007039 for ; Thu, 4 Oct 2007 04:59:51 -0600 Subject: Re: [PATCH] Don't build arch/powerpc/sysdev/dcr.c for ARCH=ppc kernels From: Josh Boyer To: Grant Likely In-Reply-To: <20071004044911.30154.23109.stgit@trillian.cg.shawcable.net> References: <20071004044911.30154.23109.stgit@trillian.cg.shawcable.net> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Thu, 04 Oct 2007 05:56:45 -0500 Message-Id: <1191495405.3647.3.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, paulus@samba.org List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Wed, 2007-10-03 at 22:50 -0600, Grant Likely wrote: > From: Grant Likely > > dcr.c is an arch/powerpc only thing. > > Signed-off-by: Grant Likely > --- > > Ben/Paulus, > > As far as I can tell this is correct. Having sysdev/dcr.c in the arch/ppc > build spits out warnings. Grep doesn't show anything in arch/ppc that > is using it. Sorry, no. The ibm_emac driver uses it, which is arch/ppc. (Yes, the old one.) If there are warnings, let's fix those up. Perhaps Michael's recent patches in that area introduced something. josh