linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Josh Boyer <jwboyer@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Valentine Barshak <vbarshak@ru.mvista.com>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
	david@gibson.dropbear.id.au
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PowerPC: Fix find_legacy_serial_ports on OPB.
Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2007 13:31:53 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1192127513.5534.127.camel@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <470E5CBC.9040604@ru.mvista.com>

On Thu, 2007-10-11 at 21:26 +0400, Valentine Barshak wrote:
> Josh Boyer wrote:
> > On Thu, 2007-10-11 at 17:50 +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> >> On Thursday 11 October 2007, Valentine Barshak wrote:
> >>> Currently find_legacy_serial_ports() can find no serial ports on the OPB.
> >>> Thus no legacy boot console can be initialized. Just the early udbg console
> >>> works, which is initialized with udbg_init_44x_as1() on the UART's physical
> >>> address specified in kernel config. This happens because we look for ns16750
> >>> and higher serial devices only and expect opb node to have a device type
> >>> property. This patch makes it look for ns16550 compatible devices and use
> >>> of_device_is_compatible() for opb instead of checking device type.
> >>> Lack of legacy serial ports found causes problems for KGDB over serial.
> >>>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Valentine Barshak <vbarshak@ru.mvista.com>
> >> The patch would make sense if we were only dealing with flattened device
> >> tree systems at this point. Unfortunately, IBM is shipping hardware that
> >> encodes the serial port in exactly the way that find_legacy_serial_ports
> >> is looking for (parent->type == "opb", compatible = "ns16750" "ns16550"
> >> "ns16450" i8250").
> >>
> >> Changing the search for ns16750 to ns16550 should be fine, but unnecessary
> >> because AFAIK, all OPB serial imlpementations are actually ns16750 and
> >> should have that in the device tree as well.
> >>
> >> For the device type of the bus, please check for both compatible and
> >> type, so that it still works on machines that are missing the compatible
> >> property.
> > 
> > Wait, no.  We already had this discussion months ago when David was
> > working on the original Ebony port.  It was declared that legacy_serial
> > is not how serial should be done on 4xx and the serial_of driver was
> > supposed to be used instead.
> > 
> > Have we changed our stance on that?  If not, then perhaps KGDB should be
> > fixed to work with serial_of.
> 
> Actually I don't see any reason not to use legacy_serial stuff for early 
> console. We could split the kernel configured very early debug output, 
> which uses  PPC_EARLY_DEBUG_44x_PHYSLOW/PHYSHIGH (since it's really 
> dangerous) and early console things by using legacy serial. We could use 
>   early boot console without PPC_EARLY_DEBUG_44x.

That was exactly my thinking when this first came up.  I'd like to hear
David's opinion on it.

josh

  reply	other threads:[~2007-10-11 18:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-10-11 15:26 [PATCH] PowerPC: Fix find_legacy_serial_ports on OPB Valentine Barshak
2007-10-11 15:50 ` Arnd Bergmann
2007-10-11 15:53   ` Josh Boyer
2007-10-11 17:09     ` Arnd Bergmann
2007-10-11 19:09       ` [PATCH] PowerPC: Add legacy serial support for OPB with flattened device tree Valentine Barshak
2007-10-11 21:10         ` Arnd Bergmann
2007-10-11 17:26     ` [PATCH] PowerPC: Fix find_legacy_serial_ports on OPB Valentine Barshak
2007-10-11 18:31       ` Josh Boyer [this message]
2007-10-12  2:31         ` David Gibson
2007-10-12 11:49           ` Josh Boyer
2007-10-11 18:49   ` Valentine Barshak

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1192127513.5534.127.camel@localhost.localdomain \
    --to=jwboyer@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=david@gibson.dropbear.id.au \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
    --cc=vbarshak@ru.mvista.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).