linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
To: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, Roland Dreier <rdreier@cisco.com>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Jeff Garzik <jeff@garzik.org>,
	linuxppc-dev list <linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH/RFC] net: Add __napi_sycnhronize() to sync with napi poll
Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2007 07:52:32 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1192657952.6783.40.camel@pasglop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20071017083107.6a1b1bd3@freepuppy.rosehill>


On Wed, 2007-10-17 at 08:31 -0700, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> Please don't use double underscore, for this function name. There is no
> reason to not make it a normal API call.
> 
> The sky2 fix I am working on will use napi_synchronize as well.

Allright. A compiler barrier in the !SMP case makes sense, but I would
still want an smp_mb() before the test_bit. I think it's a bug in
synchronize_irq not to have it.

Cheers,
Ben.
 
> --- a/include/linux/netdevice.h	2007-10-16 16:48:20.000000000 -0700
> +++ b/include/linux/netdevice.h	2007-10-17 08:29:55.000000000 -0700
> @@ -407,6 +407,24 @@ static inline void napi_enable(struct na
>  	clear_bit(NAPI_STATE_SCHED, &n->state);
>  }
>  
> +#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
> +/**
> + *	napi_synchronize - wait until NAPI is not running
> + *	@n: napi context
> + *
> + * Wait until NAPI is done being scheduled on this context.
> + * Any outstanding processing completes but
> + * does not disable future activations.
> + */
> +static inline void napi_synchronize(const struct napi_struct *n)
> +{
> +	while (test_bit(NAPI_STATE_SCHED, &n->state))
> +		msleep(1);
> +}
> +#else
> +# define napi_synchronize(n)	barrier()
> +#endif
> +
>  /*
>   *	The DEVICE structure.
>   *	Actually, this whole structure is a big mistake.  It mixes I/O

  reply	other threads:[~2007-10-17 21:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-10-16  5:49 [PATCH/RFC] net: Add __napi_sycnhronize() to sync with napi poll Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2007-10-16  6:06 ` Herbert Xu
2007-10-16  7:37   ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2007-10-16  7:44     ` David Miller
2007-10-16 18:53 ` Stephen Hemminger
2007-10-16 21:14   ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2007-10-17  2:50   ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2007-10-17  2:52   ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2007-10-17  3:16     ` Jeff Garzik
2007-10-17  3:24       ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2007-10-17 15:31         ` Stephen Hemminger
2007-10-17 21:52           ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt [this message]
2007-10-17 22:04           ` [PATCH] net: Add napi_sycnhronize() " Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2007-10-17 23:36             ` Josh Boyer
2007-10-17 23:59               ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2007-10-18  1:02             ` Josh Boyer
2007-10-18  1:26               ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2007-10-18  1:19             ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2007-10-17 23:14           ` [PATCH] fix EMAC driver for proper napi_synchronize API Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2007-10-18  0:21             ` Jeff Garzik
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2007-10-16  5:40 [PATCH/RFC] net: Add __napi_sycnhronize() to sync with napi poll Benjamin Herrenschmidt

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1192657952.6783.40.camel@pasglop \
    --to=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=jeff@garzik.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rdreier@cisco.com \
    --cc=shemminger@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).