From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from gate.crashing.org (gate.crashing.org [63.228.1.57]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E14D8DDE1C for ; Thu, 18 Oct 2007 11:19:28 +1000 (EST) Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: Add napi_sycnhronize() to sync with napi poll From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt To: Stephen Hemminger In-Reply-To: <1192658654.6783.43.camel@pasglop> References: <1192513792.19073.23.camel@pasglop> <20071016115318.0fc36af3@freepuppy.rosehill> <1192589522.11899.130.camel@pasglop> <47157EA4.1000500@garzik.org> <1192591481.11899.134.camel@pasglop> <20071017083107.6a1b1bd3@freepuppy.rosehill> <1192658654.6783.43.camel@pasglop> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2007 11:19:12 +1000 Message-Id: <1192670352.12879.2.camel@pasglop> Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, Roland Dreier , "David S. Miller" , Jeff Garzik , linuxppc-dev list Reply-To: benh@kernel.crashing.org List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , > This implements a low level __napi_synchronize() function to acheive > that. The underscores are to emphasis the low level aspect of it and > to discourage driver writers who don't know what they are doing to > use it (to please DaveM :-) And I forgot to remove that bit from the description... as pointed out by Josh. Grrr... Ben.