From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from gate.crashing.org (gate.crashing.org [63.228.1.57]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B211DDEC7 for ; Mon, 22 Oct 2007 07:11:01 +1000 (EST) Subject: Re: [PATCH] synchronize_irq needs a barrier From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt To: Herbert Xu In-Reply-To: <1192769910.7367.106.camel@pasglop> References: <1192745137.7367.40.camel@pasglop> <1192749449.7367.51.camel@pasglop> <20071019023219.GB8453@gondor.apana.org.au> <20071019042025.GA9617@gondor.apana.org.au> <20071019044806.GA10080@gondor.apana.org.au> <1192769910.7367.106.camel@pasglop> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2007 07:10:05 +1000 Message-Id: <1193001005.6745.34.camel@pasglop> Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List , linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, Thomas Gleixner , akpm@linux-foundation.org, Linus Torvalds , Ingo Molnar Reply-To: benh@kernel.crashing.org List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , .../... > This patch (mostly written by Linus) fixes this by using spin > > locks instead of memory barries on the synchronize_irq() path. > > > > Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu > > Good for me. > > Acked-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt Hrm... not on yet. Herbert, care to resend, looks like it fell down the wrong hole in Linus mailbox :-) Cheers, Ben.