From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Subject: Re: Ocotea board? From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt To: Jeff Mock In-Reply-To: <471E39E0.5070106@mock.com> References: <471E39E0.5070106@mock.com> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2007 06:36:11 +1000 Message-Id: <1193171771.2085.1.camel@pasglop> Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org Reply-To: benh@kernel.crashing.org List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Tue, 2007-10-23 at 11:13 -0700, Jeff Mock wrote: > Is the Ocotea board (the original 440GX eval board) still interesting? > I'm wrapping up a project using the 440GX, I started out hacking on the > Ocotea board to get started, but we moved off Ocotea long ago onto our > own hardware. > > I'm cleaning up the lab now that the project is nearly finished and I > would like to give the board to someone that will put it to good use. > I've sponged off this mailing list quite a lot, it's about time I give a > little something back. Well, the ocotea has an interesting "feature" related to the way the ethernet PHY an EMAC interact which I haven't dealt with in the new EMAC driver at this stage. I -think- the Taishan I have may have the same issue though, in which case I won't need it, but if not, I could have good use (or Josh in Rochester) for one of these. > The board has been hacked a little bit but still works fine. I just > powered it up and it happily booted Linux via TFTP. The boot ROM now > has u-boot, the original PIBs (or whatever) is long gone. All I ask is > that you're self-sufficient and don't bug me too much about it... > > Can someone recommend a good home? Otherwise it will wind up in > storeroom purgatory. > > jeff > > _______________________________________________ > Linuxppc-dev mailing list > Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org > https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev