linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
To: David Daney <ddaney@avtrex.com>
Cc: gdb@sourceware.org, linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org,
	Matt Mackall <mpm@selenic.com>
Subject: Re: Apparent kernel bug with GDB on ppc405
Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2007 11:52:10 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1193363530.7018.42.camel@pasglop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <471FAC48.1070008@avtrex.com>


On Wed, 2007-10-24 at 13:34 -0700, David Daney wrote:
> First of all I have never used a similar configuration so this may be 
> totally off base.  But...
> 
> If the icache is virtually indexed, then I think there are only two
> ways 
> to invalidate it.  The first is from the context of the debugged
> process 
> where the page is mapped at the location the target program will see
> it. 
>    If you try to invalidate from the context of the debugger, the
> page 
> will most likely not be mapped at the virtual address of the target 
> program so you might have to invalidate the *entire* icache.

Yup, sounds likely. We don't handle that virtual icache well at all in
linux. Things tend to work by mere luck. I have various ideas to fix
that but haven't actually implemented them.

Ben.

  reply	other threads:[~2007-10-26  1:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-10-24 19:46 Apparent kernel bug with GDB on ppc405 Matt Mackall
2007-10-24 20:28 ` Grant Likely
2007-10-24 20:42   ` Matt Mackall
2007-10-24 20:46     ` Grant Likely
2007-10-24 21:54     ` Matt Mackall
2007-10-24 22:27       ` Grant Likely
2007-10-24 22:32         ` Matt Mackall
2007-10-24 22:39           ` Grant Likely
2007-10-24 22:40             ` Grant Likely
2007-10-26  1:50               ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2007-10-24 22:41           ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2007-10-26  1:51             ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2007-10-26 20:41               ` Josh Boyer
2007-10-27  1:36                 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2007-10-27  1:27                   ` Josh Boyer
2007-10-24 20:34 ` David Daney
2007-10-26  1:52   ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt [this message]
2007-10-26  1:46 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2007-10-26  2:45   ` Grant Likely
2007-10-26  3:23     ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2007-10-26 14:41       ` Matt Mackall
2007-10-27  1:30         ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2007-10-27  7:32           ` [PATCH/RFC] powerpc: Pass PID argument to _tlbie (WAS: Apparent kernel bug with GDB on ppc405) Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2007-10-29 12:08             ` Josh Boyer
2007-10-29 20:15               ` Josh Boyer
2007-10-29 20:35                 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2007-10-29 21:13                   ` Matt Mackall

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1193363530.7018.42.camel@pasglop \
    --to=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
    --cc=ddaney@avtrex.com \
    --cc=gdb@sourceware.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org \
    --cc=mpm@selenic.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).