From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from e32.co.us.ibm.com (e32.co.us.ibm.com [32.97.110.150]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "e32.co.us.ibm.com", Issuer "Equifax" (verified OK)) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 028F0DDE19 for ; Sat, 3 Nov 2007 02:31:07 +1100 (EST) Received: from d03relay02.boulder.ibm.com (d03relay02.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.195.227]) by e32.co.us.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.13.8) with ESMTP id lA2EUdMh005228 for ; Fri, 2 Nov 2007 10:30:39 -0400 Received: from d03av01.boulder.ibm.com (d03av01.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.195.167]) by d03relay02.boulder.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v8.5) with ESMTP id lA2FE78b047752 for ; Fri, 2 Nov 2007 09:31:00 -0600 Received: from d03av01.boulder.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d03av01.boulder.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.13.3) with ESMTP id lA2Es5tW015565 for ; Fri, 2 Nov 2007 08:54:05 -0600 Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] Add arch-specific walk_memory_remove() for ppc64 From: Badari Pulavarty To: Johannes Berg In-Reply-To: <1193999530.25744.3.camel@johannes.berg> References: <1193849335.17412.33.camel@dyn9047017100.beaverton.ibm.com> <1193999530.25744.3.camel@johannes.berg> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Fri, 02 Nov 2007 07:57:18 -0800 Message-Id: <1194019038.1547.0.camel@dyn9047017100.beaverton.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: linux-mm , anton@au1.ibm.com, linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, Paul Mackerras , Andrew Morton , KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Fri, 2007-11-02 at 10:32 +0000, Johannes Berg wrote: > > This patch provides a way for an architecture to provide its > > own walk_memory_resource() > > It seems that the patch description "walk_memory_remove()" is wrong? > Yep. Patch title is wrong. Thanks, Badari