From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Subject: Re: mpc5200, sysctl table check failed From: Johannes Berg To: Olof Johansson In-Reply-To: <20071107204138.GA7066@lixom.net> References: <9e4733910711071224v7bf643bahba0fd23eb2d16ee1@mail.gmail.com> <20071107204138.GA7066@lixom.net> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-/HbObaIcyM86iIDLlegN" Date: Thu, 08 Nov 2007 16:09:39 +0100 Message-Id: <1194534579.6294.46.camel@johannes.berg> Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: PowerPC dev list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , --=-/HbObaIcyM86iIDLlegN Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > I posted a patch for this yesterday, it's harmless, just a warning. That's not actually true, if the sysctl check code warns in any way the sysctl file doesn't show up in /proc/sys/ johannes --=-/HbObaIcyM86iIDLlegN Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Comment: Johannes Berg (powerbook) iQIVAwUARzMmsqVg1VMiehFYAQIsWw/9GPqdldsJfwkpz2EIKNpzlU7+liqUjNWI Ly2XoofgJc3B4JqtoGayQKyc2j5pdNBPTVx7tZbxoK/o4587HUbff/K0NCGaJ4ww oVDPFP0cqnh1ryWFnAkaVr9QNzGZvItB32FjJX4/A7YjENFHVlnSOE3eFVV5vZVo RSwDIsw/l7hEZBcUM0dirGT1rOV46KBR3KhhrG7OWdsZGsx1StN+yj/Yo751YsOP JbaDcSBbhzJhUBHp7mheDJaIXbzcWYXU0er6c7Lt9nQMnV8/XIf9GWh4JAGR5UlY bQZnrCdQLdNWl7kDAwMR/pnPrBThbwYpr/ipP5gW6b///MiHBenKxGeugQLvSFa7 /KRjO41+MNrcRZuwi2N57ihyWQTj97hvufRfqZHLMpxG+tOOvg6mfYb7r5PEkQwx KdLqRHGOjz+HcWYpQRZ4hX3y7kHkdyzPCovr9qu9Kiydwb3ZgAFiowHVQVYlUpjc TDa/zP27CotozBugLDKzVWKnodiecrdnwt0umMbMVloH8sZE7xBzuscQMNXI8gu6 BkDmn3u35EGi2m8xVzJxixjtNheoEOkjxkXd/CszRGrzChr7n8Ino6KUr8NgfACX qggYHwaH1tQl3EwOzws4Aqkbk2pMo9xZpx6NhYtjEoK112jAExC7ifKtqPPsHzXL EjLToql823s= =aIaW -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-/HbObaIcyM86iIDLlegN--