From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from az33egw02.freescale.net (az33egw02.freescale.net [192.88.158.103]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "az33egw02.freescale.net", Issuer "Thawte Premium Server CA" (verified OK)) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57F4BDDE03 for ; Wed, 21 Nov 2007 09:22:54 +1100 (EST) Subject: Re: dtc: Add testcases for tree checks From: Jon Loeliger To: David Gibson In-Reply-To: <20071120220309.GB13156@localhost.localdomain> References: <20071120052423.GC4356@localhost.localdomain> <20071120220309.GB13156@localhost.localdomain> Content-Type: text/plain Message-Id: <1195597354.25887.39.camel@ld0161-tx32> Mime-Version: 1.0 Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2007 16:22:34 -0600 Cc: "linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org" , Jon Loeliger List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Tue, 2007-11-20 at 16:03, David Gibson wrote: > Well, yes. But, IMO, every time anyone other that you or I has > commented on one of these patches as it goes past counts as an > occasion when it's better that I've been using patches, rather than > pushing to you direct with git. I am not asking you to stop sending patches. I'm asking you to generate your patches with git. Git's patch format, send through mail, handles the execute permissions. > Actually, that should be possible with mails too, it's just that I > forgot the --- line. Right. I'm just asking for it to be used. :-) jdl