From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from gate.crashing.org (gate.crashing.org [63.228.1.57]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A066ADDDF7 for ; Wed, 21 Nov 2007 18:28:23 +1100 (EST) Subject: Re: [PATCH 8/8] ibm_newemac: Skip EMACs that are marked unused by the firmware From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt To: Stefan Roese In-Reply-To: <200711210813.51525.sr@denx.de> References: <20071121060737.6AA72DDE0C@ozlabs.org> <200711210813.51525.sr@denx.de> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2007 18:28:09 +1100 Message-Id: <1195630089.6970.62.camel@pasglop> Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, jgarzik@pobox.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org Reply-To: benh@kernel.crashing.org List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Wed, 2007-11-21 at 08:13 +0100, Stefan Roese wrote: > On Wednesday 21 November 2007, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: > > From: Hugh Blemings > > > > Depending on how the 44x processors are wired, some EMAC cells > > might not be useable (and not connected to a PHY). However, some > > device-trees may choose to still expose them (since their registers > > are present in the MMIO space) but with an "unused" property in them. > > > > Signed-off-by: Hugh Blemings > > Signed-off-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt > > Acked-by: Stefan Roese I noticed that I forgot to add your Ack's to the patches. I'll do so before I ask Paul to pull them. Thanks ! Ben.