From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from gate.crashing.org (gate.crashing.org [63.228.1.57]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 777D0DDE9F for ; Sat, 24 Nov 2007 12:31:52 +1100 (EST) Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] PowerPC: ibm_newemac minor fixes. From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt To: Jeff Garzik In-Reply-To: <47477C55.8090209@garzik.org> References: <20071123190747.GA25654@ru.mvista.com> <1195867102.7195.31.camel@pasglop> <47477C55.8090209@garzik.org> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Sat, 24 Nov 2007 12:31:34 +1100 Message-Id: <1195867894.7195.40.camel@pasglop> Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org Reply-To: benh@kernel.crashing.org List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Fri, 2007-11-23 at 20:20 -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote: > Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: > > On Fri, 2007-11-23 at 22:07 +0300, Valentine Barshak wrote: > > > >> These patches have some minor ibm_newemac fixes. > > > > All 3 patches look good, thanks. I'll sign them off and forward them > > to Jeff in my next batch. > > > > Jeff, did you already pick up my previous drop of EMAC patches from last > > week for .25 or not ? If not, I will resend the whole lot along with > > Valentine's patches sometime next week. > > Just got back from Thanksgiving holiday, and am about to go through the > lot that's sitting in my inbox. > > Just let me know what you would prefer me to do, starting from today. Then wait for my next batch and ignore previous patches, except the one titled "ibm_newemac: Fix possible lockup on close" which is a 2.6.24 bug fix. Thanks ! Cheers, Ben.