From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from gate.crashing.org (gate.crashing.org [63.228.1.57]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FE52DDDCA for ; Sun, 25 Nov 2007 09:28:19 +1100 (EST) Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] PowerPC 74xx: Katana Qp base support From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt To: Arnd Bergmann In-Reply-To: <200711241952.00186.arnd@arndb.de> References: <20071116163116.GE25062@ru.mvista.com> <200711241952.00186.arnd@arndb.de> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Sun, 25 Nov 2007 09:28:04 +1100 Message-Id: <1195943284.7195.63.camel@pasglop> Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org Reply-To: benh@kernel.crashing.org List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Sat, 2007-11-24 at 19:51 +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > This should be done automatically using of_platform_bus_probe(). Not necessarily. of_platform_bus_probe() is an optional facility that is common used by SoCs that have lots of otherwise non-probable on chip devices, but for platforms with more classic setups, it's totally acceptable to have the platform code explicitely register only those devices it wants exposed. Ben.