linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
To: Jon Smirl <jonsmirl@gmail.com>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: Access to PCI Expansion ROMs on PPC
Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2007 07:20:00 +1100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1196022000.7195.70.camel@pasglop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9e4733910711250530r454c01ecoe8867a7f492b8704@mail.gmail.com>


On Sun, 2007-11-25 at 08:30 -0500, Jon Smirl wrote:
> 
> > The two cards with x86 firmware return 0xFF for those two readb()
> > instructions, while the X1900 with OF returns 0x00 for the readb().
> >
> > Could one of the more knowledgeable folk for PPC intricacies suggest
> why
> > those readb calls are returning the wrong data?
> 
> I don't know PPC at this low of level but it may be a problem with non
> word-aligned access to memory. I thought readb() was supposed to work
> on all archs and alignment issues are handled inside readb(). Also,
> the readw() may have an endian bug.

Ugh ? Read be reads -bytes- ! Can you tell me how the hell can a byte
access be non-aligned ?


> BenH, has source code for an x86 emulator that will run on PPC. That
> will let you run the ROMs. The original plan was for the kernel to
> generate a uevent that would have triggered the x86 emulator to run.
> 
> Progress along that path was blocked by the X developers. The X server
> contains code for enabling the PCI ROM and reading it from user space.
> I wanted to move this code out of X and into the kernel.
> 
> Because the path was blocked things like the PCI ROM API were never
> throughly tested. It works most of the time but the occasional problem
> is still turning up. Once we identify the PPC problem we can fix it in
> the kernel.

Nobody blocked anything, you are free to develop an emulator triggered
by a uevent, nobody prevented you from doing so.

Now, regarding that user problem, this it totally unrelated as it's a
"mac" card.

It's possible that it's one of these radeons that disable ROM access via
a register in which case a quirk is needed to re-enable it.

Ben.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2007-11-25 20:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-11-25  1:57 Access to PCI Expansion ROMs on PPC Robin H. Johnson
2007-11-25  2:13 ` Jon Smirl
2007-11-25 11:15   ` Robin H. Johnson
2007-11-25 11:49     ` Robin H. Johnson
2007-11-25 13:30       ` Jon Smirl
2007-11-25 19:41         ` Robin H. Johnson
2007-11-26  8:59           ` Robin H. Johnson
2007-11-26  9:20             ` Michel Dänzer
2007-11-26 10:24               ` Robin H. Johnson
2007-11-26 16:33                 ` Jon Smirl
2007-11-26 17:35                   ` Robin H. Johnson
2007-11-25 20:20         ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt [this message]
2007-11-25 20:51           ` Jon Smirl
2007-11-25 20:54             ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2007-11-25 21:24           ` Jon Smirl
2007-11-25 21:34             ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2007-11-25  9:42 ` Andreas Schwab
2007-11-25  9:58   ` Robin H. Johnson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1196022000.7195.70.camel@pasglop \
    --to=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
    --cc=jonsmirl@gmail.com \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).